Case
Presentation: Developing better methods for use with a family to increase the
patient’s (family's) treatment adherence.
Learning
Objective/Clinical Question: What interventions
can I integrate into practice that may be helpful for this family?
Brief
case description: Kane is a 5-year-old boy with End Stage Renal Disease
(ESRD) secondary to Nephrotic Syndrome.
Nephrotic Syndrome is actually a treatable and curable illness and, when
treatment is followed, the patient normally does not progress to ESRD; in
Kane’s case, however, his family was not able to follow the treatment regimen
and, as a result, Kane is now dialysis-dependent. He lives three hours away and has to come to Mott Children’s
Hospital 3 days a week to receive hemodialysis treatments—his Nephrotic
Syndrome was actually being treated at another hospital—Kane did not come to
Mott until he had already progressed to ESRD and needed dialysis. Now that Kane has ESRD the only
permanent “cure” for him is a kidney transplant. In order to be listed for a kidney transplant the patient
and his family need to demonstrate consistent adherence to four different
treatment areas for three consecutive months (this is to ensure that the family
will be able to care the patient post-transplant because the medical
requirements post-transplant are even greater than those necessary for
dialysis); the four treatment areas for adherence are 1) dietary goals, 2)
fluid goals, 3) medication goals, and 4) dialysis goals.
Summary
of your clinical formulation or impressions: Kane has a present diagnosis of End Stage Renal
Disease. His family is, as
classified by hospital neuropsychiatric testing standards, “low-functioning,”
meaning that his primary caregiver’s IQ is below a certain threshold. His mother is his primary caregiver and
she does not have a great deal of social support—her father often times helps
out with Kane by bringing him to treatments, however he also falls under this
“low-functioning” standard. It is
very clear that Kane’s mother loves him, cares about him, and tries her best to
provide proper care for him—the hospital at which Kane previously received
treatment filed against his mother for medical neglect—his mother is very
cognizant of the implications of being accused of medical neglect for a second
time. Kane’s mother certainly
wants to get Kane on the transplant list and is aware of each of the steps that
need to be taken to accomplish this goal, however she has difficulty completing
some of the day-to-day tasks that make this goal possible.
Interventions
used or treatment plan goals: Through a number of interventions developed across all staff
areas (social workers, the dialysis unit teacher, nurses, physicians, etc.),
Kane and his mother are currently doing very well regarding his dialysis goals
(i.e. never missing a treatment and arriving on time) and medication goals
(i.e. following his medication regimen exactly)—the multidiscipline focus has
been noted to be effective in increasing adherence for transplant candidates
(De Besler et al., 2009). Kane’s
lab results, however, show that he is not following the “kidney diet” and is
drinking too much during the day (these two are very related—kidney diets are
characterized by low consumption of salt, phosphorous, and potassium, all of
which make you thirsty). We
(social work) have worked with the dialysis teacher to develop a schedule and
diet notebook for Kane’s mother (she indicated that she thought this would be
most helpful, as she needs concrete goals set out in front of her). In this notebook she can record the
details of each of Kane’s meals (one sheet per day), as well as his fluid
consumptions—when she comes in for her monthly clinic visit (or, if she prefers
to do it earlier it can be done during a dialysis session) the dietician and
social worker will meet with her to discuss the results. Additionally, the dietician inserted
(into the front of the notebook) a list of “kidney-friendly” foods separated by
meal and category (i.e. meat, vegetables, fruit, grains, etc.). With the implementation of this
intervention (approximately 1.5 months now) Kane’s labs have looked a little
better—his mother, however, reports that she has trouble telling him he can’t
have chips or frozen meals because their schedule is so hectic (i.e. driving 3
hours to get to Ann Arbor, dialyzing for 3 hours, and driving 3 hours back home
3 times a week). The family also is
struggling financially, which makes matters a bit more complicated.
Other
Goals:
·
To increase Kane’s mother’s sense of
self-efficacy (to make her feel confident
that
she has the ability to accomplish all of the goals for Kane’s treatment)
- This is noted as being particularly important by Tong
et al. (2008) based on the unique experiences of parents of children with
chronic illness
·
To develop the skills necessary for Kane’s
mother to accomplish her personal
goals
for Kane (i.e. to better educate her about inexpensive, healthy foods and to make
her feel more empowered as a parent)
·
To work with Kane to develop a kidney diet
that meets some of his needs
Case
Presentation Question: I asked the group for any alternative interventions
that can be implemented with this family to order to help them meet their own
personal goals for Kane’s treatment (and ultimately, for him to be listed for
transplant).
Additional
Ideas from Colleagues:
·
To look into at-home services that are
available to provide additional
social/parenting
support to Kane’s mother
·
To look at literature for assessing barriers
related to non-adherence
- Rushe and McGee (1998) describe two scales [The Renal
Adherence Attitudes Questionnaire and the Renal Adherence Behavior
Questionnaire] their role as facilitators for adherence (and adherence
barrier) assessment—these could potentially be utilized for this case
·
To work on developing step-by-step
instructions for Kane’s mother for handling
Kane’s
behavior (i.e. whining) when he wants to eat non-kidney-friendly foods
·
To do a role-play with Kane’s mother
pertaining to a scenario where Kane whines about
not being allowed to eat certain foods (i.e. chips or pizza); this may help
her
to practice saying ‘no’
·
To look at the emotions/feelings behind Kane’s
mother’s “behaviors”
- For example, does she give Kane chips to stop him from
whining when his baby sister refuses to stop crying? Does she potentially feel
overwhelmed in certain situations?
- When using this technique, it is important to build on
strengths/to emphasize the logistics of times or situations in which
Kane’s mother doesn’t “give in” to his whining
- To use a point system/token economy with Kane
- To give Kane consequences for his food-seeking
behaviors
- Look at his motivations and use those
- These incentives could come from both the hospital and
his home
- This technique is discussed extensively in
- Magrab and Papadopoulou (1977) discuss the use of a
token economy on dietary adherence for children on hemodialysis and found
it to have a positive outcome on patient weight and BUN levels (a routine
part of renal lab work)
References:
De Bleser, L., Matteson, M., Dobbels, F.,
Russell, C., & De Geest, S. (2009). Interventions
to improve medication‐adherence after transplantation: a systematic
review. Transplant International, 22(8), 780-797.
Griffin, K. J., & Elkin, T. D. (2001). Non‐adherence in pediatric transplantation: A review of
the existing literature. Pediatric transplantation, 5(4), 246-249.
Magrab, P. R., & Papadopoulou, Z. L.
(1977). The effect of a token economy on dietary compliance
for children on hemodialysis. Journal of applied behavior analysis, 10(4), 573-578.
Rushe, H., & Mcgee, H. M. (1998). Assessing
adherence to dietary recommendations for
hemodialysis patients: the Renal Adherence Attitudes Questionnaire (RAAQ) and
the Renal Adherence Behaviour Questionnaire (RABQ). Journal of psychosomatic
research, 45(2), 149-157.
Tong, A., Lowe, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig,
J. C. (2008). Experiences of parents who have
children with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Pediatrics, 121(2), 349-360.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.